time
Date and time library. Fully interoperable with the standard library. Mostly compatible with #![no_std].
This package has a good security score with no known vulnerabilities.
Community Reviews
Solid datetime library with excellent type safety but steeper learning curve
Error messages are generally clear, especially around parsing failures and invalid date construction. The `format_description` macro for parsing/formatting takes some getting used to, but the compile-time validation catches mistakes early. Debugging is straightforward since types are transparent about what they represent.
Community support is decent—GitHub issues get responses, though Stack Overflow coverage is lighter than chrono. The maintainer is responsive to bugs and the crate feels actively maintained. Common operations like parsing ISO 8601, adding durations, and formatting are straightforward once you grasp the type system. The biggest hurdle is the initial learning curve coming from other datetime libraries or languages.
Best for: Projects requiring strong type safety around datetime handling, especially when timezone correctness is critical or no_std support is needed.
Avoid if: You need to prototype quickly with minimal datetime knowledge or require extensive third-party integrations that only support chrono.
Solid date/time library with excellent type safety but macros take adjustment
Documentation is thorough with good API reference coverage, though I found the cookbook examples sometimes assume familiarity with datetime concepts. Error messages are generally helpful - when you misuse the macros or try invalid operations, the compiler feedback points you in the right direction. Formatting and parsing use a custom syntax that's more powerful than strftime but requires consulting the docs frequently at first.
Community support is decent but smaller than chrono's. GitHub issues get responses within days usually, though Stack Overflow coverage is lighter. The migration from 0.2 to 0.3 had breaking changes, but the changelog was detailed enough to work through. Overall, it's reliable for production use once you're past the initial learning curve.
Best for: Projects prioritizing type safety and compile-time correctness, or requiring no_std compatibility.
Avoid if: You need extensive ecosystem integration or prefer chrono's more familiar strftime-style formatting.
Solid alternative to chrono with better type safety and ergonomics
Day-to-day usage is pleasant. Error messages are generally helpful, especially with the format description system pointing to exactly where parsing fails. The `Duration` type is more ergonomic than stdlib's, with methods like `.whole_seconds()` and `.whole_milliseconds()` that avoid confusion. The crate's interoperability with stdlib types is seamless when needed.
The main learning curve comes from choosing between types (when to use `OffsetDateTime` vs `PrimitiveDateTime`) and understanding the macro-based formatting system. GitHub issues are actively maintained, and the maintainer is responsive. Some Stack Overflow coverage exists but isn't as extensive as chrono, so you'll often refer back to docs.
Best for: New projects needing a modern, type-safe date/time library with good ergonomics and no_std support.
Avoid if: You need extensive third-party integrations or rely heavily on community Q&A sites for troubleshooting.
Sign in to write a review
Sign In